Gambia vs Lithuania: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Gambia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Lithuania, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 132nd and Lithuania ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1888 kt | 0.0008 kt | 0.188 kt | Gambia |
| 2000s | 0.0273 kt | 0.0014 kt | 0.0259 kt | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Gambia or Lithuania?
- Gambia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Gambia and Lithuania?
- 0 kt, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Gambia and Lithuania rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Gambia ranks 132nd and Lithuania ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf