India vs Russia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- India
- Russia
How they compare
India currently reports 5.5 kt against 4.62 kt in Russia, a difference of 0.88 kt.
That makes India's figure about 1.2 times Russia's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russia ahead.
India ranks 14th and Russia ranks 16th of 254 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, India averaged higher in 1 and Russia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.65 kt | 14.12 kt | 9.47 kt | Russia |
| 2000s | 6.51 kt | 10.24 kt | 3.73 kt | Russia |
| 2010s | 10.65 kt | 11.34 kt | 0.69 kt | Russia |
| 2020s | 9.08 kt | 5.13 kt | 3.95 kt | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, India or Russia?
- India, at 5.5 kt against 4.62 kt in Russia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between India and Russia?
- 0.88 kt, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Russia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do India and Russia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- India ranks 14th and Russia ranks 16th of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf