Lithuania vs Niger: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Lithuania
- Niger
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Niger, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Niger ahead.
Lithuania ranks 119th and Niger ranks 119th of 236 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Niger in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0008 kt | 0.1223 kt | 0.1215 kt | Niger |
| 2000s | 0.0014 kt | 0.0123 kt | 0.0109 kt | Niger |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Lithuania or Niger?
- Lithuania, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Niger as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Lithuania and Niger?
- 0 kt, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Niger?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Niger rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Lithuania ranks 119th and Niger ranks 119th of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf