Mayotte vs Turkmenistan: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Mayotte
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Mayotte currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.
Mayotte ranks 132nd and Turkmenistan ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mayotte | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Mayotte or Turkmenistan?
- Mayotte, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Mayotte and Turkmenistan?
- 0 kt, with Mayotte ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mayotte and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Mayotte and Turkmenistan rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Mayotte ranks 132nd and Turkmenistan ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf