Mongolia vs Romania: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Mongolia
- Romania
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.0002 kt against 0.0002 kt in Romania, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 99th and Romania ranks 99th of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 3 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.5163 kt | 0.0307 kt | 0.4856 kt | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0.1318 kt | 0.0129 kt | 0.1189 kt | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.022 kt | 0.0163 kt | 0.0057 kt | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0386 kt | 0.0384 kt | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Mongolia or Romania?
- Mongolia, at 0.0002 kt against 0.0002 kt in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Mongolia and Romania?
- 0 kt, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Romania?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Mongolia and Romania rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Mongolia ranks 99th and Romania ranks 99th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf