Montenegro vs Puerto Rico: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Montenegro
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 106th and Puerto Rico ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0015 kt | 0 kt | 0.0015 kt | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 0.006 kt | 0 kt | 0.006 kt | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 0.0052 kt | 0 kt | 0.0052 kt | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Montenegro or Puerto Rico?
- Montenegro, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Montenegro and Puerto Rico?
- 0 kt, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Puerto Rico?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Puerto Rico rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Montenegro ranks 106th and Puerto Rico ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf