Niger vs Serbia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Niger
- Serbia
How they compare
Niger currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Serbia, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Niger ranks 106th and Serbia ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.016 kt | 0.016 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.008 kt | 0.008 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0081 kt | 0.0081 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Niger or Serbia?
- Niger, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Niger and Serbia?
- 0 kt, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Niger and Serbia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Niger ranks 106th and Serbia ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf