Serbia vs Somalia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Serbia
- Somalia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Somalia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 106th and Somalia ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Somalia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.016 kt | 0 kt | 0.016 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0.008 kt | 0 kt | 0.008 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0.0081 kt | 0 kt | 0.0081 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Serbia or Somalia?
- Serbia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Somalia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Serbia and Somalia?
- 0 kt, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Somalia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Somalia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Serbia ranks 106th and Somalia ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf