Italy vs Latvia: LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC over time
- Italy
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 2.1 kt against 1.65 kt in Italy, a difference of 0.45 kt.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.3 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 28 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 20th and Latvia ranks 19th of 69 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3 kt | 1.93 kt | 1.07 kt | Italy |
| 2000s | 2.32 kt | 1.95 kt | 0.3728 kt | Italy |
| 2010s | 1.47 kt | 2.02 kt | 0.5444 kt | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc, Italy or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 2.1 kt against 1.65 kt in Italy as of 2019.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc between Italy and Latvia?
- 0.45 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Latvia?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2019.
- How do Italy and Latvia rank globally for lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc?
- Italy ranks 20th and Latvia ranks 19th of 69 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf