Madagascar vs Turkey: LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC over time
- Madagascar
- Turkey
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 0.5 kt against 0.481 kt in Turkey, a difference of 0.019 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Turkey ahead.
Madagascar ranks 35th and Turkey ranks 36th of 69 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4167 kt | 0.2644 kt | 0.1522 kt | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 0.5 kt | 0.1418 kt | 0.3582 kt | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc, Madagascar or Turkey?
- Madagascar, at 0.5 kt against 0.481 kt in Turkey as of 2010.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc between Madagascar and Turkey?
- 0.019 kt, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Turkey?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2010.
- How do Madagascar and Turkey rank globally for lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc?
- Madagascar ranks 35th and Turkey ranks 36th of 69 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf