Guyana vs Sweden: Maize (corn) — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O)
Maize (corn) — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O) over time
- Guyana
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0.0004 kt against 0.0003 kt in Guyana, a difference of 0.0001 kt.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.3 times Guyana's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Guyana ranks 133rd and Sweden ranks 130th of 164 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0001 kt | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0004 kt | 0.0003 kt | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher maize (corn) — crop residues, Guyana or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 0.0004 kt against 0.0003 kt in Guyana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in maize (corn) — crop residues between Guyana and Sweden?
- 0.0001 kt, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Sweden?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Sweden rank globally for maize (corn) — crop residues?
- Guyana ranks 133rd and Sweden ranks 130th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Maize (corn) — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).