Belarus vs Sudan: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Belarus
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 2,165 kt against 2,106 kt in Belarus, a difference of 59 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 53rd and Sudan ranks 51st of 228 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,288 kt | 2,161 kt | 126.63 kt | Belarus |
| 2020s | 2,193 kt | 2,176 kt | 16.28 kt | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure management — emissions (co2eq), Belarus or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 2,165 kt against 2,106 kt in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure management — emissions (co2eq) between Belarus and Sudan?
- 59 kt, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Sudan rank globally for manure management — emissions (co2eq)?
- Belarus ranks 53rd and Sudan ranks 51st of 228 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf