China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

China, Hong Kong SAR
0.6938 kt
in 2023
Jordan
0.1833 kt
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
41st
Jordan rank
42nd

Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Jordan
01234196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0.6938 kt against 0.1833 kt in Jordan, a difference of 0.5105 kt.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 3.8 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 41st and Jordan ranks 42nd of 59 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 6 and Jordan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 3.06 kt 0.389 kt 2.67 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 1.76 kt 0.3694 kt 1.39 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 0.1951 kt 0.3035 kt 0.1083 kt Jordan
1990s 0.3512 kt 0.2851 kt 0.0661 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 0.5813 kt 0.1945 kt 0.3868 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 0.6342 kt 0.1914 kt 0.4428 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 0.6903 kt 0.184 kt 0.5063 kt China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), China, Hong Kong SAR or Jordan?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0.6938 kt against 0.1833 kt in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan?
0.5105 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan rank globally for meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 41st and Jordan ranks 42nd of 59 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/china-hong-kong-sar/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/china-hong-kong-sar/jordan/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
92 places, 4,069 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.