China, Hong Kong SAR vs Mauritius: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

China, Hong Kong SAR
0.6938 kt
in 2023
Mauritius
0.0392 kt
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
41st
Mauritius rank
43rd

Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Mauritius
01234196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0.6938 kt against 0.0392 kt in Mauritius, a difference of 0.6546 kt.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 17.7 times Mauritius's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 41st and Mauritius ranks 43rd of 59 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 3.06 kt 0.0339 kt 3.03 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 1.76 kt 0.0392 kt 1.72 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 0.1951 kt 0.0392 kt 0.1559 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 0.3512 kt 0.0392 kt 0.312 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 0.5813 kt 0.0392 kt 0.5421 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 0.6342 kt 0.0392 kt 0.595 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 0.6903 kt 0.0392 kt 0.6511 kt China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), China, Hong Kong SAR or Mauritius?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0.6938 kt against 0.0392 kt in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Mauritius?
0.6546 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Mauritius rank globally for meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 41st and Mauritius ranks 43rd of 59 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Mauritius: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/china-hong-kong-sar/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/china-hong-kong-sar/mauritius/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Mauritius: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
92 places, 4,069 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.