China, Hong Kong SAR vs Poland: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

China, Hong Kong SAR
0.6938 kt
in 2023
Poland
1.28 kt
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
41st
Poland rank
39th

Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Poland
01234196119922023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 1.28 kt against 0.6938 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.5862 kt.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.8 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2018 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 41st and Poland ranks 39th of 59 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Poland Difference Ahead
2010s 0.663 kt 0 kt 0.663 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 0.6903 kt 0.32 kt 0.3703 kt China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), China, Hong Kong SAR or Poland?
Poland, at 1.28 kt against 0.6938 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Poland?
0.5862 kt, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Poland?
6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Poland rank globally for meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 41st and Poland ranks 39th of 59 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Poland: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/china-hong-kong-sar/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/china-hong-kong-sar/poland/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Poland: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
92 places, 4,069 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.