China, Taiwan Province of vs Suriname: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

China, Taiwan Province of
4.19 kt
in 2023
Suriname
2.08 kt
in 2023
China, Taiwan Province of rank
34th
Suriname rank
35th

Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • China, Taiwan Province of
  • Suriname
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

China, Taiwan Province of currently reports 4.19 kt against 2.08 kt in Suriname, a difference of 2.11 kt.

That makes China, Taiwan Province of's figure about 2.0 times Suriname's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, China, Taiwan Province of has been ahead every year.

China, Taiwan Province of ranks 34th and Suriname ranks 35th of 59 countries.

China, Taiwan Province of has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Taiwan Province of Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 584.79 kt 0 kt 584.79 kt China, Taiwan Province of
1970s 283.18 kt 0 kt 283.18 kt China, Taiwan Province of
1980s 92.39 kt 0.5623 kt 91.83 kt China, Taiwan Province of
1990s 31.25 kt 1.34 kt 29.91 kt China, Taiwan Province of
2000s 10.01 kt 1.05 kt 8.95 kt China, Taiwan Province of
2010s 5.79 kt 1.64 kt 4.15 kt China, Taiwan Province of
2020s 4.19 kt 2.14 kt 2.05 kt China, Taiwan Province of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), China, Taiwan Province of or Suriname?
China, Taiwan Province of, at 4.19 kt against 2.08 kt in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between China, Taiwan Province of and Suriname?
2.11 kt, with China, Taiwan Province of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Taiwan Province of and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Taiwan Province of and Suriname rank globally for meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
China, Taiwan Province of ranks 34th and Suriname ranks 35th of 59 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Taiwan Province of vs Suriname: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/china-taiwan-province-of/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/china-taiwan-province-of/suriname/">China, Taiwan Province of vs Suriname: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
92 places, 4,069 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.