European Union (27) vs Sri Lanka: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

European Union (27)
436.66 kt
in 2023
Sri Lanka
415.2 kt
in 2023
European Union (27) rank
14th
Sri Lanka rank
17th

Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • European Union (27)
  • Sri Lanka
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922023

How they compare

European Union (27) currently reports 436.66 kt against 415.2 kt in Sri Lanka, a difference of 21.46 kt.

That makes European Union (27)'s figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

European Union (27) ranks 14th and Sri Lanka ranks 17th of 22 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, European Union (27) averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade European Union (27) Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 247.68 kt 1,435 kt 1,187 kt Sri Lanka
1970s 147.37 kt 1,316 kt 1,168 kt Sri Lanka
1980s 161.86 kt 1,575 kt 1,414 kt Sri Lanka
1990s 114.28 kt 1,154 kt 1,040 kt Sri Lanka
2000s 152.82 kt 479.5 kt 326.68 kt Sri Lanka
2010s 352.14 kt 479.74 kt 127.61 kt Sri Lanka
2020s 438.67 kt 423.59 kt 15.08 kt European Union (27)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), European Union (27) or Sri Lanka?
European Union (27), at 436.66 kt against 415.2 kt in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between European Union (27) and Sri Lanka?
21.46 kt, with European Union (27) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for European Union (27) and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do European Union (27) and Sri Lanka rank globally for meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
European Union (27) ranks 14th and Sri Lanka ranks 17th of 22 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

European Union (27) vs Sri Lanka: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/european-union-27/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/european-union-27/sri-lanka/">European Union (27) vs Sri Lanka: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
92 places, 4,069 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.