Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Micronesia: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
4,223 kt
in 2023
Micronesia
0.3455 kt
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
9th
Micronesia rank
10th

Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Micronesia
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 4,223 kt against 0.3455 kt in Micronesia, a difference of 4,223 kt.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th and Micronesia ranks 10th of 22 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Micronesia Difference Ahead
1990s 4,743 kt 0.263 kt 4,743 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 5,670 kt 0.2715 kt 5,670 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 7,093 kt 0.3335 kt 7,093 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 6,066 kt 0.3448 kt 6,066 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Micronesia?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 4,223 kt against 0.3455 kt in Micronesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Micronesia?
4,223 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Micronesia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Micronesia rank globally for meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th and Micronesia ranks 10th of 22 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Micronesia: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/micronesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/micronesia/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Micronesia: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
92 places, 4,069 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.