Russian Federation vs Suriname: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Russian Federation
10.57 kt
in 2023
Suriname
2.08 kt
in 2023
Russian Federation rank
32nd
Suriname rank
35th

Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Suriname
01020304050196119922023

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 10.57 kt against 2.08 kt in Suriname, a difference of 8.49 kt.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 5.1 times Suriname's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Russian Federation ranks 32nd and Suriname ranks 35th of 59 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 42.15 kt 1.36 kt 40.79 kt Russian Federation
2000s 32.21 kt 1.05 kt 31.15 kt Russian Federation
2010s 14.23 kt 1.64 kt 12.59 kt Russian Federation
2020s 12.07 kt 2.14 kt 9.93 kt Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Russian Federation or Suriname?
Russian Federation, at 10.57 kt against 2.08 kt in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Russian Federation and Suriname?
8.49 kt, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Suriname?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Russian Federation and Suriname rank globally for meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Russian Federation ranks 32nd and Suriname ranks 35th of 59 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Suriname: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/russian-federation-2/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/russian-federation-2/suriname/">Russian Federation vs Suriname: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
92 places, 4,069 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.