Australia vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Australia
0.0025 kt per person
in 2023
Uruguay
0.0066 kt per person
in 2023
Australia rank
3rd
Uruguay rank
1st

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Australia
  • Uruguay
0.0020.0040.0060.008196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.0066 kt per person against 0.0025 kt per person in Australia, a difference of 0.0041 kt per person.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 2.6 times Australia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 3rd and Uruguay ranks 1st of 167 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0032 kt per person 0.0061 kt per person 0.0028 kt per person Uruguay
1970s 0.0046 kt per person 0.0066 kt per person 0.0021 kt per person Uruguay
1980s 0.0032 kt per person 0.0063 kt per person 0.0031 kt per person Uruguay
1990s 0.0031 kt per person 0.0059 kt per person 0.0028 kt per person Uruguay
2000s 0.003 kt per person 0.0067 kt per person 0.0037 kt per person Uruguay
2010s 0.0026 kt per person 0.0065 kt per person 0.0039 kt per person Uruguay
2020s 0.0022 kt per person 0.0064 kt per person 0.0042 kt per person Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Australia or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0.0066 kt per person against 0.0025 kt per person in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and Uruguay?
0.0041 kt per person, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Uruguay rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Australia ranks 3rd and Uruguay ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/australia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/australia/uruguay/">Australia vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.