How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Ecuador?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belgium vs Ecuador: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Belgium

0.0003 kt per person

in 2023

Ecuador

0.0003 kt per person

in 2023

Belgium rank

50th

Ecuador rank

48th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

Belgium
Ecuador

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.0003 kt per person against 0.0003 kt per person in Belgium, a difference of 0 kt per person.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 50th and Ecuador ranks 48th of 167 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belgium	Ecuador	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0005 kt per person	0.0006 kt per person	0.0001 kt per person	Ecuador
2010s	0.0004 kt per person	0.0005 kt per person	0.0001 kt per person	Ecuador
2020s	0.0003 kt per person	0.0004 kt per person	0 kt per person	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Belgium or Ecuador?: Ecuador, at 0.0003 kt per person against 0.0003 kt per person in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Belgium and Ecuador?: 0 kt per person, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Ecuador?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Ecuador rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Belgium ranks 50th and Ecuador ranks 48th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Ecuador: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/belgium/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/belgium/ecuador/">Belgium vs Ecuador: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit: kt per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.