Congo vs Ghana: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Congo
0.0001 kt per person
in 2023
Ghana
0.0001 kt per person
in 2023
Congo rank
123rd
Ghana rank
121st

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Congo
  • Ghana
000000196119922023

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 0.0001 kt per person against 0.0001 kt per person in Congo, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ghana ahead.

Congo ranks 123rd and Ghana ranks 121st of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Ghana in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Ghana Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Ghana
1970s 0 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Ghana
1980s 0 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person Ghana
1990s 0 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person Ghana
2000s 0.0001 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person Ghana
2010s 0.0001 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person Congo
2020s 0.0001 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Congo or Ghana?
Ghana, at 0.0001 kt per person against 0.0001 kt per person in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Congo and Ghana?
0 kt per person, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Ghana?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Ghana rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Congo ranks 123rd and Ghana ranks 121st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Ghana: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/congo-rep/ghana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/congo-rep/ghana/">Congo vs Ghana: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.