Ecuador vs Turkmenistan: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Ecuador
0.0003 kt per person
in 2023
Turkmenistan
0.0003 kt per person
in 2023
Ecuador rank
48th
Turkmenistan rank
46th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Ecuador
  • Turkmenistan
000.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 0.0003 kt per person against 0.0003 kt per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 48th and Turkmenistan ranks 46th of 167 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0007 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person 0.0005 kt per person Ecuador
2000s 0.0006 kt per person 0.0004 kt per person 0.0002 kt per person Ecuador
2010s 0.0005 kt per person 0.0004 kt per person 0.0001 kt per person Ecuador
2020s 0.0004 kt per person 0.0003 kt per person 0 kt per person Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Ecuador or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 0.0003 kt per person against 0.0003 kt per person in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Ecuador and Turkmenistan?
0 kt per person, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Turkmenistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Turkmenistan rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Ecuador ranks 48th and Turkmenistan ranks 46th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Turkmenistan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/ecuador/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/ecuador/turkmenistan/">Ecuador vs Turkmenistan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.