Australia and New Zealand vs Ethiopia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Australia and New Zealand
78,754 kt
in 2023
Ethiopia
79,444 kt
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
9th
Ethiopia rank
8th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Ethiopia
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 79,444 kt against 78,754 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 690 kt.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 9th and Ethiopia ranks 8th of 190 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Ethiopia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Ethiopia Difference Ahead
1990s 70,269 kt 35,630 kt 34,639 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 73,720 kt 47,327 kt 26,393 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 72,372 kt 60,603 kt 11,770 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 69,114 kt 77,548 kt 8,433 kt Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Australia and New Zealand or Ethiopia?
Ethiopia, at 79,444 kt against 78,754 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and New Zealand and Ethiopia?
690 kt, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Ethiopia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Ethiopia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 9th and Ethiopia ranks 8th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Ethiopia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/australia-and-new-zealand/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/australia-and-new-zealand/ethiopia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Ethiopia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,667 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.