Australia and New Zealand vs Mexico: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Australia and New Zealand
78,754 kt
in 2023
Mexico
67,808 kt
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
9th
Mexico rank
10th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Mexico
40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 78,754 kt against 67,808 kt in Mexico, a difference of 10,946 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 9th and Mexico ranks 10th of 190 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 48,943 kt 36,217 kt 12,726 kt Australia and New Zealand
1970s 77,834 kt 45,335 kt 32,499 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 63,609 kt 57,532 kt 6,077 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 68,489 kt 58,948 kt 9,541 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 73,720 kt 58,133 kt 15,587 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 72,372 kt 61,978 kt 10,395 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 69,114 kt 66,981 kt 2,133 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Australia and New Zealand or Mexico?
Australia and New Zealand, at 78,754 kt against 67,808 kt in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and New Zealand and Mexico?
10,946 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Mexico rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 9th and Mexico ranks 10th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Mexico: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/australia-and-new-zealand/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/australia-and-new-zealand/mexico/">Australia and New Zealand vs Mexico: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,667 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.