Australia vs Eastern Africa: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Australia
67,292 kt
in 2023
Eastern Africa
194,739 kt
in 2023
Australia rank
11th
Eastern Africa rank
8th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Australia
  • Eastern Africa
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eastern Africa currently reports 194,739 kt against 67,292 kt in Australia, a difference of 127,447 kt.

That makes Eastern Africa's figure about 2.9 times Australia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Eastern Africa has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 11th and Eastern Africa ranks 8th of 190 countries.

Eastern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Eastern Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 36,929 kt 72,175 kt 35,246 kt Eastern Africa
1970s 62,429 kt 82,150 kt 19,721 kt Eastern Africa
1980s 50,802 kt 87,873 kt 37,071 kt Eastern Africa
1990s 55,362 kt 93,617 kt 38,255 kt Eastern Africa
2000s 60,729 kt 110,795 kt 50,066 kt Eastern Africa
2010s 60,399 kt 153,799 kt 93,400 kt Eastern Africa
2020s 57,082 kt 190,646 kt 133,564 kt Eastern Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Australia or Eastern Africa?
Eastern Africa, at 194,739 kt against 67,292 kt in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and Eastern Africa?
127,447 kt, with Eastern Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Eastern Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Eastern Africa rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Australia ranks 11th and Eastern Africa ranks 8th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Eastern Africa: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/australia/eastern-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/australia/eastern-africa/">Australia vs Eastern Africa: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,667 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.