Micronesia vs Northern Africa: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Micronesia
35.69 kt
in 2023
Northern Africa
34,407 kt
in 2023
Micronesia rank
19th
Northern Africa rank
22nd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Micronesia
  • Northern Africa
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Northern Africa currently reports 34,407 kt against 35.69 kt in Micronesia, a difference of 34,371 kt.

That makes Northern Africa's figure about 964.0 times Micronesia's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Northern Africa has been ahead every year.

Micronesia ranks 19th and Northern Africa ranks 22nd of 20 countries.

Northern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia Northern Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 28.77 kt 36,202 kt 36,173 kt Northern Africa
2000s 28.73 kt 41,019 kt 40,990 kt Northern Africa
2010s 33.01 kt 37,556 kt 37,523 kt Northern Africa
2020s 35.16 kt 34,436 kt 34,401 kt Northern Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Micronesia or Northern Africa?
Northern Africa, at 34,407 kt against 35.69 kt in Micronesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Micronesia and Northern Africa?
34,371 kt, with Northern Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia and Northern Africa?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Micronesia and Northern Africa rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Micronesia ranks 19th and Northern Africa ranks 22nd of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia vs Northern Africa: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/micronesia/northern-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/micronesia/northern-africa/">Micronesia vs Northern Africa: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,667 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.