South Africa vs Uganda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

South Africa
14,458 kt
in 2023
Uganda
14,625 kt
in 2023
South Africa rank
34th
Uganda rank
32nd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • South Africa
  • Uganda
5.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 14,625 kt against 14,458 kt in South Africa, a difference of 167 kt.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 34th and Uganda ranks 32nd of 190 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 13,855 kt 3,858 kt 9,997 kt South Africa
1970s 14,691 kt 5,085 kt 9,607 kt South Africa
1980s 15,277 kt 4,772 kt 10,505 kt South Africa
1990s 16,070 kt 5,154 kt 10,915 kt South Africa
2000s 16,511 kt 6,400 kt 10,110 kt South Africa
2010s 16,103 kt 12,921 kt 3,182 kt South Africa
2020s 14,500 kt 14,442 kt 58.75 kt South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), South Africa or Uganda?
Uganda, at 14,625 kt against 14,458 kt in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between South Africa and Uganda?
167 kt, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Uganda rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
South Africa ranks 34th and Uganda ranks 32nd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Uganda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/south-africa/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/south-africa/uganda/">South Africa vs Uganda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,667 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.