Southern Africa vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Southern Africa
20,879 kt
in 2023
Uruguay
22,367 kt
in 2023
Southern Africa rank
26th
Uruguay rank
23rd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Southern Africa
  • Uruguay
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 22,367 kt against 20,879 kt in Southern Africa, a difference of 1,488 kt.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Southern Africa's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Southern Africa ahead.

Southern Africa ranks 26th and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 29 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Southern Africa averaged higher in 6 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Southern Africa Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 19,178 kt 16,200 kt 2,978 kt Southern Africa
1970s 21,583 kt 18,970 kt 2,613 kt Southern Africa
1980s 21,942 kt 18,951 kt 2,991 kt Southern Africa
1990s 22,765 kt 18,647 kt 4,118 kt Southern Africa
2000s 23,579 kt 22,087 kt 1,493 kt Southern Africa
2010s 22,705 kt 21,838 kt 866.6 kt Southern Africa
2020s 20,199 kt 21,851 kt 1,653 kt Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Southern Africa or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 22,367 kt against 20,879 kt in Southern Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Southern Africa and Uruguay?
1,488 kt, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Africa and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Southern Africa and Uruguay rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Southern Africa ranks 26th and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Southern Africa vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/southern-africa/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/southern-africa/uruguay/">Southern Africa vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,667 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.