Faroe Islands vs Latvia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

Faroe Islands
-13.83 % change on previous year
in 2023
Latvia
-16.15 % change on previous year
in 2023
Faroe Islands rank
198th
Latvia rank
201st

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Latvia
-50050100196719952023

How they compare

Faroe Islands currently reports -13.83 % change on previous year against -16.15 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 2.32 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Faroe Islands ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 198th and Latvia ranks 201st of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0047 % change on previous year 6.66 % change on previous year 6.66 % change on previous year Latvia
2000s 0.1894 % change on previous year 2.79 % change on previous year 2.6 % change on previous year Latvia
2010s 6.78 % change on previous year 4.45 % change on previous year 2.33 % change on previous year Faroe Islands
2020s -4.05 % change on previous year -2.59 % change on previous year 1.46 % change on previous year Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, Faroe Islands or Latvia?
Faroe Islands, at -13.83 % change on previous year against -16.15 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between Faroe Islands and Latvia?
2.32 % change on previous year, with Faroe Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Latvia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Faroe Islands and Latvia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
Faroe Islands ranks 198th and Latvia ranks 201st of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Latvia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/faroe-islands/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/faroe-islands/latvia/">Faroe Islands vs Latvia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 13,291 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.