Malta vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

Malta
-2.95 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sweden
-3.22 % change on previous year
in 2023
Malta rank
162nd
Sweden rank
165th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • Malta
  • Sweden
-250255075196219922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports -2.95 % change on previous year against -3.22 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 0.27 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 34 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 162nd and Sweden ranks 165th of 208 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 5 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s -0.2939 % change on previous year -3.28 % change on previous year 2.99 % change on previous year Malta
1970s 12.42 % change on previous year 0.9268 % change on previous year 11.49 % change on previous year Malta
1980s 14.24 % change on previous year -0.1938 % change on previous year 14.43 % change on previous year Malta
1990s -3.52 % change on previous year 1.11 % change on previous year 4.63 % change on previous year Sweden
2000s 0.2704 % change on previous year -0.301 % change on previous year 0.5713 % change on previous year Malta
2010s 3.03 % change on previous year -0.553 % change on previous year 3.58 % change on previous year Malta
2020s -0.2489 % change on previous year -0.2223 % change on previous year 0.0266 % change on previous year Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, Malta or Sweden?
Malta, at -2.95 % change on previous year against -3.22 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between Malta and Sweden?
0.27 % change on previous year, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sweden?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Malta and Sweden rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
Malta ranks 162nd and Sweden ranks 165th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/malta/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/malta/sweden/">Malta vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 13,291 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.