Australia and New Zealand vs Ecuador: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

Australia and New Zealand
26.39 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Ecuador
27.57 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
111th
Ecuador rank
109th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Ecuador
20406080196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 27.57 kg CO2eq/kg against 26.39 kg CO2eq/kg in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 1.18 kg CO2eq/kg.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 111th and Ecuador ranks 109th of 189 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 41.37 kg CO2eq/kg 71.8 kg CO2eq/kg 30.43 kg CO2eq/kg Ecuador
1970s 39.67 kg CO2eq/kg 58.73 kg CO2eq/kg 19.06 kg CO2eq/kg Ecuador
1980s 32.11 kg CO2eq/kg 69.16 kg CO2eq/kg 37.05 kg CO2eq/kg Ecuador
1990s 28.62 kg CO2eq/kg 61.41 kg CO2eq/kg 32.79 kg CO2eq/kg Ecuador
2000s 27.06 kg CO2eq/kg 37.07 kg CO2eq/kg 10.01 kg CO2eq/kg Ecuador
2010s 24.54 kg CO2eq/kg 30.55 kg CO2eq/kg 6.01 kg CO2eq/kg Ecuador
2020s 24.93 kg CO2eq/kg 28.31 kg CO2eq/kg 3.38 kg CO2eq/kg Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, Australia and New Zealand or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 27.57 kg CO2eq/kg against 26.39 kg CO2eq/kg in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between Australia and New Zealand and Ecuador?
1.18 kg CO2eq/kg, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Ecuador rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 111th and Ecuador ranks 109th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Ecuador: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/australia-and-new-zealand/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/australia-and-new-zealand/ecuador/">Australia and New Zealand vs Ecuador: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity
Unit
kg CO2eq/kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
238 places, 13,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.