Australia and New Zealand vs Martinique: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

Australia and New Zealand
26.39 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Martinique
28.38 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2006
Australia and New Zealand rank
111th
Martinique rank
108th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Martinique
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Martinique currently reports 28.38 kg CO2eq/kg against 26.39 kg CO2eq/kg in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 1.99 kg CO2eq/kg.

That makes Martinique's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 111th and Martinique ranks 108th of 189 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 4 and Martinique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Martinique Difference Ahead
1960s 41.37 kg CO2eq/kg 35 kg CO2eq/kg 6.37 kg CO2eq/kg Australia and New Zealand
1970s 39.67 kg CO2eq/kg 33.29 kg CO2eq/kg 6.38 kg CO2eq/kg Australia and New Zealand
1980s 32.11 kg CO2eq/kg 28.29 kg CO2eq/kg 3.82 kg CO2eq/kg Australia and New Zealand
1990s 28.62 kg CO2eq/kg 22.77 kg CO2eq/kg 5.85 kg CO2eq/kg Australia and New Zealand
2000s 27.2 kg CO2eq/kg 27.87 kg CO2eq/kg 0.6664 kg CO2eq/kg Martinique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, Australia and New Zealand or Martinique?
Martinique, at 28.38 kg CO2eq/kg against 26.39 kg CO2eq/kg in Australia and New Zealand as of 2006.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between Australia and New Zealand and Martinique?
1.99 kg CO2eq/kg, with Martinique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Martinique?
46 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2006.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Martinique rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 111th and Martinique ranks 108th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Martinique: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/australia-and-new-zealand/martinique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/australia-and-new-zealand/martinique/">Australia and New Zealand vs Martinique: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity
Unit
kg CO2eq/kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
238 places, 13,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.