Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

Bahamas
8.18 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
8.21 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Bahamas rank
170th
Zimbabwe rank
169th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • Bahamas
  • Zimbabwe
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 8.21 kg CO2eq/kg against 8.18 kg CO2eq/kg in Bahamas, a difference of 0.03 kg CO2eq/kg.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Bahamas ranks 170th and Zimbabwe ranks 169th of 189 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 33.12 kg CO2eq/kg 71.9 kg CO2eq/kg 38.78 kg CO2eq/kg Zimbabwe
1970s 26.74 kg CO2eq/kg 65.25 kg CO2eq/kg 38.51 kg CO2eq/kg Zimbabwe
1980s 19.16 kg CO2eq/kg 76.43 kg CO2eq/kg 57.27 kg CO2eq/kg Zimbabwe
1990s 12.16 kg CO2eq/kg 17.57 kg CO2eq/kg 5.41 kg CO2eq/kg Zimbabwe
2000s 5.07 kg CO2eq/kg 10.24 kg CO2eq/kg 5.17 kg CO2eq/kg Zimbabwe
2010s 4.38 kg CO2eq/kg 9.31 kg CO2eq/kg 4.93 kg CO2eq/kg Zimbabwe
2020s 8.04 kg CO2eq/kg 8.35 kg CO2eq/kg 0.3014 kg CO2eq/kg Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, Bahamas or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 8.21 kg CO2eq/kg against 8.18 kg CO2eq/kg in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
0.03 kg CO2eq/kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Zimbabwe rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
Bahamas ranks 170th and Zimbabwe ranks 169th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/bahamas-the/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/bahamas-the/zimbabwe/">Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity
Unit
kg CO2eq/kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
238 places, 13,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.