China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

China, Hong Kong SAR
0.4597 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Jordan
1.36 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
188th
Jordan rank
185th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Jordan
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 1.36 kg CO2eq/kg against 0.4597 kg CO2eq/kg in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.9003 kg CO2eq/kg.

That makes Jordan's figure about 3.0 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 188th and Jordan ranks 185th of 189 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8717 kg CO2eq/kg 38.58 kg CO2eq/kg 37.71 kg CO2eq/kg Jordan
1970s 0.5231 kg CO2eq/kg 18.05 kg CO2eq/kg 17.53 kg CO2eq/kg Jordan
1980s 0.0886 kg CO2eq/kg 12.78 kg CO2eq/kg 12.69 kg CO2eq/kg Jordan
1990s 0.1048 kg CO2eq/kg 8.83 kg CO2eq/kg 8.72 kg CO2eq/kg Jordan
2000s 0.2131 kg CO2eq/kg 3.39 kg CO2eq/kg 3.18 kg CO2eq/kg Jordan
2010s 0.3947 kg CO2eq/kg 1.79 kg CO2eq/kg 1.39 kg CO2eq/kg Jordan
2020s 0.4436 kg CO2eq/kg 1.11 kg CO2eq/kg 0.6619 kg CO2eq/kg Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, China, Hong Kong SAR or Jordan?
Jordan, at 1.36 kg CO2eq/kg against 0.4597 kg CO2eq/kg in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan?
0.9003 kg CO2eq/kg, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 188th and Jordan ranks 185th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/china-hong-kong-sar/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/china-hong-kong-sar/jordan/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity
Unit
kg CO2eq/kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
238 places, 13,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.