Argentina vs Australia and New Zealand: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production

Argentina
3.29 million t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand
2.98 million t
in 2023
Argentina rank
5th
Australia and New Zealand rank
6th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production over time

  • Argentina
  • Australia and New Zealand
1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M3.0M3.5M196119922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 3.29 million t against 2.98 million t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 302,370 t.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 5th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 6 and Australia and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Australia and New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 2.38 million t 1.19 million t 1.19 million t Argentina
1970s 2.55 million t 2.04 million t 513,971 t Argentina
1980s 2.68 million t 1.99 million t 696,605 t Argentina
1990s 2.76 million t 2.40 million t 363,255 t Argentina
2000s 2.93 million t 2.73 million t 199,428 t Argentina
2010s 2.76 million t 2.96 million t 200,432 t Australia and New Zealand
2020s 3.15 million t 2.77 million t 374,302 t Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, Argentina or Australia and New Zealand?
Argentina, at 3.29 million t against 2.98 million t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production between Argentina and Australia and New Zealand?
302,370 t, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Australia and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Australia and New Zealand rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production?
Argentina ranks 5th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Australia and New Zealand: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production/argentina/australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production/argentina/australia-and-new-zealand/">Argentina vs Australia and New Zealand: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,601 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.