Australia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production

Australia
2.24 million t
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
544,984 t
in 2023
Australia rank
7th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
5th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production over time

  • Australia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
01.0M2.0M3.0M196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 2.24 million t against 544,984 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 1.69 million t.

That makes Australia's figure about 4.1 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 190 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 896,351 t 92,409 t 803,942 t Australia
1970s 1.56 million t 115,683 t 1.44 million t Australia
1980s 1.48 million t 157,784 t 1.32 million t Australia
1990s 1.82 million t 211,420 t 1.61 million t Australia
2000s 2.10 million t 194,185 t 1.90 million t Australia
2010s 2.32 million t 342,130 t 1.97 million t Australia
2020s 2.03 million t 516,606 t 1.52 million t Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, Australia or United Republic of Tanzania?
Australia, at 2.24 million t against 544,984 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production between Australia and United Republic of Tanzania?
1.69 million t, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production?
Australia ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production/australia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production/australia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Australia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,601 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.