Barbados vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production

Barbados
166.06 t
in 2023
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
209 t
in 2023
Barbados rank
180th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
178th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production over time

  • Barbados
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2004006008001.0k196119922023

How they compare

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 209 t against 166.06 t in Barbados, a difference of 42.94 t.

That makes Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's figure about 1.3 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 180th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 178th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 5 and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1960s 390.11 t 259.37 t 130.74 t Barbados
1970s 361.8 t 264.44 t 97.36 t Barbados
1980s 401.6 t 265.35 t 136.25 t Barbados
1990s 819.8 t 225.34 t 594.45 t Barbados
2000s 308.2 t 196.1 t 112.1 t Barbados
2010s 162.39 t 205.43 t 43.04 t Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2020s 177.51 t 191.53 t 14.01 t Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, Barbados or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 209 t against 166.06 t in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production between Barbados and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
42.94 t, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production?
Barbados ranks 180th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 178th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production/barbados/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production/barbados/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Barbados vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,601 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.