Botswana vs Serbia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual

Botswana
-5.97 % change on previous year
in 2023
Serbia
-7.37 % change on previous year
in 2023
Botswana rank
168th
Serbia rank
171st

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual over time

  • Botswana
  • Serbia
-50050100196219922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports -5.97 % change on previous year against -7.37 % change on previous year in Serbia, a difference of 1.4 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.

Botswana ranks 168th and Serbia ranks 171st of 212 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 3.25 % change on previous year 43.57 % change on previous year 40.32 % change on previous year Serbia
2010s -6.27 % change on previous year -1.3 % change on previous year 4.97 % change on previous year Serbia
2020s 7.86 % change on previous year -1.38 % change on previous year 9.24 % change on previous year Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual, Botswana or Serbia?
Botswana, at -5.97 % change on previous year against -7.37 % change on previous year in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual between Botswana and Serbia?
1.4 % change on previous year, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Serbia?
17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Serbia rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual?
Botswana ranks 168th and Serbia ranks 171st of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Serbia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/botswana/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/botswana/serbia/">Botswana vs Serbia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
242 places, 13,446 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.