Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Melanesia
25.27 kt
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
28.3 kt
in 2023
Melanesia rank
14th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
13th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Melanesia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
020406080100196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 28.3 kt against 25.27 kt in Melanesia, a difference of 3.03 kt.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Melanesia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Melanesia ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 20 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Melanesia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 2.43 kt 12.73 kt 10.3 kt United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 4.17 kt 20.94 kt 16.78 kt United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 12.19 kt 27.08 kt 14.89 kt United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 18.86 kt 48.76 kt 29.9 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 24.48 kt 72.96 kt 48.48 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 28.58 kt 77.63 kt 49.06 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 29.48 kt 43.96 kt 14.48 kt United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Melanesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 28.3 kt against 25.27 kt in Melanesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
3.03 kt, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Melanesia ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
242 places, 13,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.