Saudi Arabia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Saudi Arabia
728.4 kt
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
28.3 kt
in 2023
Saudi Arabia rank
14th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
13th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Saudi Arabia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 728.4 kt against 28.3 kt in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 700.1 kt.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 25.7 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Saudi Arabia ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 193 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 6 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saudi Arabia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 7.43 kt 12.73 kt 5.31 kt United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 25.1 kt 20.94 kt 4.15 kt Saudi Arabia
1980s 168.19 kt 27.08 kt 141.11 kt Saudi Arabia
1990s 330.18 kt 48.76 kt 281.43 kt Saudi Arabia
2000s 486.41 kt 72.96 kt 413.44 kt Saudi Arabia
2010s 632.2 kt 77.63 kt 554.56 kt Saudi Arabia
2020s 705.76 kt 43.96 kt 661.8 kt Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Saudi Arabia or United Republic of Tanzania?
Saudi Arabia, at 728.4 kt against 28.3 kt in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Saudi Arabia and United Republic of Tanzania?
700.1 kt, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Saudi Arabia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Saudi Arabia ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saudi Arabia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/saudi-arabia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/saudi-arabia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Saudi Arabia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
242 places, 13,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.