Belarus vs Turkmenistan: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual

Belarus
22 % change on previous year
in 2023
Turkmenistan
27.36 % change on previous year
in 2023
Belarus rank
11th
Turkmenistan rank
9th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual over time

  • Belarus
  • Turkmenistan
-50-250255075199320082023

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 27.36 % change on previous year against 22 % change on previous year in Belarus, a difference of 5.36 % change on previous year.

That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Turkmenistan ahead.

Belarus ranks 11th and Turkmenistan ranks 9th of 211 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Turkmenistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s -5.03 % change on previous year 8.45 % change on previous year 13.49 % change on previous year Turkmenistan
2000s -1.96 % change on previous year -0.7065 % change on previous year 1.26 % change on previous year Turkmenistan
2010s 1.1 % change on previous year 0.228 % change on previous year 0.8675 % change on previous year Belarus
2020s 7.66 % change on previous year -1.99 % change on previous year 9.65 % change on previous year Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual, Belarus or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 27.36 % change on previous year against 22 % change on previous year in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual between Belarus and Turkmenistan?
5.36 % change on previous year, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Turkmenistan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Turkmenistan rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual?
Belarus ranks 11th and Turkmenistan ranks 9th of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Turkmenistan: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/belarus/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/belarus/turkmenistan/">Belarus vs Turkmenistan: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 13,380 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.