Latvia vs Oceania: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual

Latvia
4.24 % change on previous year
in 2023
Oceania
-5.78 % change on previous year
in 2023
Latvia rank
29th
Oceania rank
27th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual over time

  • Latvia
  • Oceania
-50050100196219922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 4.24 % change on previous year against -5.78 % change on previous year in Oceania, a difference of 10.02 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Oceania ahead.

Latvia ranks 29th and Oceania ranks 27th of 211 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Oceania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Oceania Difference Ahead
1990s -2.26 % change on previous year 1.3 % change on previous year 3.56 % change on previous year Oceania
2000s -3.41 % change on previous year -2.17 % change on previous year 1.23 % change on previous year Oceania
2010s -4.71 % change on previous year -4.46 % change on previous year 0.2542 % change on previous year Oceania
2020s -0.338 % change on previous year -2.07 % change on previous year 1.73 % change on previous year Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual, Latvia or Oceania?
Latvia, at 4.24 % change on previous year against -5.78 % change on previous year in Oceania as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual between Latvia and Oceania?
10.02 % change on previous year, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Oceania?
28 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Oceania rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual?
Latvia ranks 29th and Oceania ranks 27th of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Oceania: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/latvia/oceania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/latvia/oceania/">Latvia vs Oceania: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 13,380 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.