Australia and New Zealand vs Latvia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

Australia and New Zealand
0.2374 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Latvia
0.2385 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
168th
Latvia rank
167th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Latvia
0.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.2385 kg CO2eq/kg against 0.2374 kg CO2eq/kg in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.0011 kg CO2eq/kg.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 168th and Latvia ranks 167th of 192 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4259 kg CO2eq/kg 0.7385 kg CO2eq/kg 0.3126 kg CO2eq/kg Latvia
2000s 0.359 kg CO2eq/kg 0.4382 kg CO2eq/kg 0.0793 kg CO2eq/kg Latvia
2010s 0.2636 kg CO2eq/kg 0.3046 kg CO2eq/kg 0.0411 kg CO2eq/kg Latvia
2020s 0.248 kg CO2eq/kg 0.2384 kg CO2eq/kg 0.0096 kg CO2eq/kg Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, Australia and New Zealand or Latvia?
Latvia, at 0.2385 kg CO2eq/kg against 0.2374 kg CO2eq/kg in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between Australia and New Zealand and Latvia?
0.0011 kg CO2eq/kg, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Latvia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Latvia rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 168th and Latvia ranks 167th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Latvia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/australia-and-new-zealand/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/australia-and-new-zealand/latvia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Latvia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity
Unit
kg CO2eq/kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
241 places, 13,757 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.