Ghana vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

Ghana
4.07 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1.35 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Ghana rank
7th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
7th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • Ghana
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1234196119922023

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 4.07 kg CO2eq/kg against 1.35 kg CO2eq/kg in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 2.72 kg CO2eq/kg.

That makes Ghana's figure about 3.0 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Ghana has been ahead every year.

Ghana ranks 7th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 7th of 192 countries.

Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 2.94 kg CO2eq/kg 2.26 kg CO2eq/kg 0.6887 kg CO2eq/kg Ghana
1970s 2.75 kg CO2eq/kg 2.13 kg CO2eq/kg 0.6207 kg CO2eq/kg Ghana
1980s 2.75 kg CO2eq/kg 1.76 kg CO2eq/kg 0.9961 kg CO2eq/kg Ghana
1990s 2.71 kg CO2eq/kg 1.82 kg CO2eq/kg 0.8843 kg CO2eq/kg Ghana
2000s 3.27 kg CO2eq/kg 1.61 kg CO2eq/kg 1.65 kg CO2eq/kg Ghana
2010s 3.88 kg CO2eq/kg 1.48 kg CO2eq/kg 2.4 kg CO2eq/kg Ghana
2020s 3.93 kg CO2eq/kg 1.34 kg CO2eq/kg 2.6 kg CO2eq/kg Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, Ghana or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Ghana, at 4.07 kg CO2eq/kg against 1.35 kg CO2eq/kg in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between Ghana and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
2.72 kg CO2eq/kg, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ghana and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
Ghana ranks 7th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 7th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/ghana/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/ghana/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Ghana vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity
Unit
kg CO2eq/kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
241 places, 13,757 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.