Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

Melanesia
0.4958 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
0.292 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Melanesia rank
16th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
18th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • Melanesia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Melanesia currently reports 0.4958 kg CO2eq/kg against 0.292 kg CO2eq/kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0.2038 kg CO2eq/kg.

That makes Melanesia's figure about 1.7 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Melanesia ranks 16th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 18th of 20 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Melanesia averaged higher in 4 and United Republic of Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Melanesia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 1.31 kg CO2eq/kg 2.03 kg CO2eq/kg 0.7213 kg CO2eq/kg United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 1.26 kg CO2eq/kg 1.57 kg CO2eq/kg 0.3108 kg CO2eq/kg United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 1.5 kg CO2eq/kg 1.49 kg CO2eq/kg 0.0137 kg CO2eq/kg Melanesia
1990s 1.41 kg CO2eq/kg 1.51 kg CO2eq/kg 0.1035 kg CO2eq/kg United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 1.29 kg CO2eq/kg 1.16 kg CO2eq/kg 0.1331 kg CO2eq/kg Melanesia
2010s 0.9281 kg CO2eq/kg 0.9104 kg CO2eq/kg 0.0177 kg CO2eq/kg Melanesia
2020s 0.7224 kg CO2eq/kg 0.5066 kg CO2eq/kg 0.2158 kg CO2eq/kg Melanesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, Melanesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
Melanesia, at 0.4958 kg CO2eq/kg against 0.292 kg CO2eq/kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.2038 kg CO2eq/kg, with Melanesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
Melanesia ranks 16th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 18th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity
Unit
kg CO2eq/kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
241 places, 13,757 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.