Norway vs Suriname: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita

Norway
0 kt per person
in 2023
Suriname
0 kt per person
in 2023
Norway rank
116th
Suriname rank
119th

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time

  • Norway
  • Suriname
00000196119922023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Suriname, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.

Norway ranks 116th and Suriname ranks 119th of 162 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Suriname
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Norway
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Norway
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Suriname
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Suriname
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Suriname
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Norway or Suriname?
Norway, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Norway and Suriname?
0 kt per person, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Norway and Suriname rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
Norway ranks 116th and Suriname ranks 119th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Suriname: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/norway/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/norway/suriname/">Norway vs Suriname: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,185 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.