Cuba vs Malta: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth

Cuba
-13.56 % change on previous year
in 2023
Malta
-12.47 % change on previous year
in 2023
Cuba rank
159th
Malta rank
158th

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth over time

  • Cuba
  • Malta
-1000100200300196219922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports -12.47 % change on previous year against -13.56 % change on previous year in Cuba, a difference of 1.09 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 35 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 159th and Malta ranks 158th of 183 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0713 % change on previous year 22.24 % change on previous year 22.16 % change on previous year Malta
1970s 0.1263 % change on previous year 17.21 % change on previous year 17.09 % change on previous year Malta
1980s -4.13 % change on previous year 8.82 % change on previous year 12.95 % change on previous year Malta
1990s 13.65 % change on previous year 27.26 % change on previous year 13.61 % change on previous year Malta
2000s -2 % change on previous year 11.66 % change on previous year 13.66 % change on previous year Malta
2010s -3.43 % change on previous year -1.82 % change on previous year 1.62 % change on previous year Malta
2020s 1.68 % change on previous year 8.17 % change on previous year 6.48 % change on previous year Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth, Cuba or Malta?
Malta, at -12.47 % change on previous year against -13.56 % change on previous year in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth between Cuba and Malta?
1.09 % change on previous year, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Malta?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Malta rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth?
Cuba ranks 159th and Malta ranks 158th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Malta: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/cuba/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/cuba/malta/">Cuba vs Malta: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 11,951 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.