Antigua and Barbuda vs Rwanda: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Antigua and Barbuda
0 kt per person
in 2023
Rwanda
0 kt per person
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
92nd
Rwanda rank
93rd

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Rwanda
00000196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 92nd and Rwanda ranks 93rd of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Rwanda
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Rwanda
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Antigua and Barbuda or Rwanda?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Antigua and Barbuda and Rwanda?
0 kt per person, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Rwanda rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 92nd and Rwanda ranks 93rd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Rwanda: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/rwanda/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Rwanda: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
150 places, 8,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.