Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

Iran (Islamic Republic of)
4.15 kg CO2eq/kg
in 1979
United Republic of Tanzania
2.87 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Iran (Islamic Republic of) rank
14th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
16th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • Iran (Islamic Republic of)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
246810196119922023

How they compare

Iran (Islamic Republic of) currently reports 4.15 kg CO2eq/kg against 2.87 kg CO2eq/kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 1.28 kg CO2eq/kg.

That makes Iran (Islamic Republic of)'s figure about 1.4 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 16th of 19 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran (Islamic Republic of) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 6.47 kg CO2eq/kg 9.19 kg CO2eq/kg 2.73 kg CO2eq/kg United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 4.42 kg CO2eq/kg 9.15 kg CO2eq/kg 4.72 kg CO2eq/kg United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, Iran (Islamic Republic of) or United Republic of Tanzania?
Iran (Islamic Republic of), at 4.15 kg CO2eq/kg against 2.87 kg CO2eq/kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 1979.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between Iran (Islamic Republic of) and United Republic of Tanzania?
1.28 kg CO2eq/kg, with Iran (Islamic Republic of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran (Islamic Republic of) and United Republic of Tanzania?
19 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1979.
How do Iran (Islamic Republic of) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 16th of 19 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/iran-islamic-republic-of/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/iran-islamic-republic-of/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity
Unit
kg CO2eq/kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
219 places, 12,522 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.